top of page

Retail Funds in Malta: Balancing Flexibility and Investor Protection

  • saskiavanvredenbur
  • Sep 26
  • 2 min read

Malta has established itself as a dynamic jurisdiction for retail funds, combining legal flexibility with a strong regulatory framework. Under the Investment Services Act (ISA), collective investment schemes (CISs) are defined in a vehicle-agnostic manner. They may be structured as companies, partnerships, trusts, foundations, or contractual funds. Yet, the Société d’Investissement à Capital Variable (SICAV) remains the most common choice. Its ability to operate as a multi-fund or multi-class structure, coupled with ring-fencing provisions, makes it highly attractive. Incorporation requires registration of the memorandum and articles of association with the Malta Business Registry.


Legal and Regulatory Framework


Retail funds operate under a layered framework. Alongside the ISA and Companies Act, EU directives, most notably UCITS V and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, are transposed into Maltese law. The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) issues specific rulebooks covering UCITS, non-UCITS, and alternative investment funds (AIFs), complemented by Listing Rules for exchange-traded funds.


Licensing is central to Malta’s regime. Any CIS formed in Malta or marketed to Maltese investors must obtain MFSA authorisation. This requirement extends to Maltese funds marketed abroad and to foreign funds targeting Malta, unless EU passporting rights apply.


Marketing and Management


Two categories of retail funds dominate: UCITS and non-UCITS retail schemes. Both open- and closed-ended funds may be marketed to the public, provided disclosures comply with the Prospectus Regulation where applicable. Funds may be externally managed or structured as self-managed companies. Managers established outside Malta must either rely on EU passporting rights or determine if local licensing is required.


Investment and Borrowing Rules


Retail funds are subject to strict limitations aimed at protecting investors. UCITS, for example, face caps on exposure to individual issuers and unlisted securities, with derivatives allowed only where aligned with investment objectives. Non-UCITS and retail AIFs follow similar but distinct rules on diversification, deposits, and derivative use. Borrowing is generally capped at 10 per cent of assets and restricted to temporary purposes.


Governance and Asset Protection


Governance obligations ensure high standards of oversight. Retail funds must have a robust board structure, typically three directors, with at least one independent of service providers. They are also required to appoint key officers, including a compliance officer and a money laundering reporting officer. Independent custodians licensed in Malta safeguard fund assets, ensuring investor protection.


Reporting and Transparency


Transparency is enforced through comprehensive reporting obligations. Funds must file annual returns, audited accounts, tax filings, and anti-money laundering questionnaires with various authorities. UCITS additionally publishes half-yearly reports. Any restrictions on the issue, transfer, or redemption of interests must be clearly disclosed in offering documents, with limited suspension powers available in exceptional circumstances.


Conclusion


Malta’s retail fund framework reflects a careful balance between flexibility and investor safeguards. While the SICAV remains the preferred structure, all retail funds benefit from a regime that integrates EU standards with local oversight. Strong governance, transparent reporting, and rigorous licensing requirements underpin investor confidence. For managers and promoters, Malta offers both opportunity and responsibility: success lies in navigating a system that rewards compliance as much as innovation.

 
 
 

Comments


Screenshot 2025-04-24 at 17.35_edited.pn

Business News Malta  
Powered by Malta Financial Services Advisory Council 

bottom of page